Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence : (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible)

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > So that yields:
> > > 
> > >  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > >  * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> > >  * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or at your option) any
> > >  * later version; or, when distributed separately from the Linux kernel or
> > >  * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the
> > 
> > You have more )s there than (s.
> 
> Thanks just removed that pesky )
> 
> > Can you get rid of the "when distributed separately from the Linux
> > kernel or incorporated into other software packages," wording? I'm not
> > exactly sure what it is trying to say, and if it limits the license
> > below in any way.
> 
> I had to pick an "or language" used already upstream and which folks were OK
> with, this was one and I went with it. I prefer it as it makes it clear the
> intent is outside of Linux I wish copyleft-next to apply.

Yes, the intent is clear. What is not clear is if the intent is
legally binding.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature