Re: [Patch 2/2]: powerpc/hotplug/mm: Fix hot-add memory node assoc

From: Reza Arbab
Date: Fri May 26 2017 - 10:32:32 EST


On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:46:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Reza Arbab <arbab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:19:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
The commit message for 3af229f2071f says:

In practice, we never see a system with 256 NUMA nodes, and in fact, we
do not support node hotplug on power in the first place, so the nodes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
that are online when we come up are the nodes that will be present for
the lifetime of this kernel.

Is that no longer true?

I don't know what the reasoning behind that statement was at the time,
but as far as I can tell, the only thing missing for node hotplug now is
Balbir's patchset [1]. He fixes the resource issue which motivated
3af229f2071f and reverts it.

With that set, I can instantiate a new numa node just by doing
add_memory(nid, ...) where nid doesn't currently exist.

But does that actually happen on any real system?

I don't know if anything currently tries to do this. My interest in having this working is so that in the future, our coherent gpu memory could be added as a distinct node by the device driver.

--
Reza Arbab