Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +       u32 max_vp_index;
> +       u32 max_lp_index;

> +       pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n",
> +               ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index);

And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?!

%u, please.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko