Re: [PATCH] ligtnvm: if LUNs are already allocated fix return

From: Matias BjÃrling
Date: Tue May 30 2017 - 09:25:05 EST


On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Matias,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 06:31:58AM +0000, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>> >
>> > On 13 May 2017, at 21.50, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > While creating new device with NVM_DEV_CREATE if LUNs are already
>> > allocated ioctl would return -ENOMEM which is wrong. This patch
>> > propagates -EBUSY from nvm_reserve_luns which is correct response.
>> >
>> > Fixes: ade69e243 ("lightnvm: merge gennvm with core")
>> > Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> > index 6a4aa60..440deb5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c
>> > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int nvm_create_tgt(struct nvm_dev *dev, struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
>> > struct nvm_target *t;
>> > struct nvm_tgt_dev *tgt_dev;
>> > void *targetdata;
>> > - int ret;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> >
>> > tt = nvm_find_target_type(create->tgttype, 1);
>> > if (!tt) {
>> > @@ -252,8 +252,9 @@ static int nvm_create_tgt(struct nvm_dev *dev, struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
>> > }
>> > mutex_unlock(&dev->mlock);
>> >
>> > - if (nvm_reserve_luns(dev, s->lun_begin, s->lun_end))
>> > - return -ENOMEM;
>> > + ret = nvm_reserve_luns(dev, s->lun_begin, s->lun_end);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + goto err;
>> >
>> > t = kmalloc(sizeof(struct nvm_target), GFP_KERNEL);
>> > if (!t) {
>> > @@ -314,8 +315,8 @@ static int nvm_create_tgt(struct nvm_dev *dev, struct nvm_ioctl_create *create)
>> > mutex_lock(&dev->mlock);
>> > list_add_tail(&t->list, &dev->targets);
>> > mutex_unlock(&dev->mlock);
>> > -
>> > - return 0;
>> > +err:
>> > + return ret;
>> > err_sysfs:
>> > if (tt->exit)
>> > tt->exit(targetdata);
>> > --
>> > 2.9.3
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Javier GonzÃlez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> May you review/approve this so that it gets queued ?

Thanks, Rakesh. Will do. Queued it up for 4.13.

-Matias