[PATCHv2 2/2] gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used

[Richard Genoud]

If more than one gpio bank has the "pwm" property, only one will be
registered successfully, all the others will fail with:
mvebu-gpio: probe of f1018140.gpio failed with error -17

That's because in alloc_pwms(), the chip->base (aka "int pwm"), was not
set (thus, ==0) ; and 0 is a meaningful start value in alloc_pwm().
What was intended is mvpwm->chip->base = -1.
Like that, the numbering will be done auto-magically

Moreover, as the region might be already occupied by another pwm, we
shouldn't force:
mvpwm->chip->base = 0
nor
mvpwm->chip->base = id * MVEBU_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;

Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828)

Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
index cdef2c78cb3b..5104b6398139 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c
@@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	mvpwm->chip.dev = dev;
 	mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops;
 	mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio;
+	/*
+	 * There may already be some PWM allocated, so we can't force
+	 * mvpwm->chip.base to a fixed point like mvchip->chip.base.
+	 * So, we let pwmchip_add() do the numbering and take the next free
+	 * region.
+	 */
+	mvpwm->chip.base = -1;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock);