[PATCH 3.16 014/212] scsi: storvsc: Fix a bug in the handling of SRB status flags

[Ben Hutchings]

3.16.44-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3209f9d780d137cdb54c85e0a776cb19e723a170 upstream.

SRB status can have additional information. Mask these out before processing
SRB status.

This patch was sent as part of a collection of patches more than a year ago.
While the rest of the patches in the set were comitted, this patch was not.
I woulod like to thank Olaf for noticing that this patch was not committed
upstream.

Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -302,11 +302,14 @@ enum storvsc_request_type {
  */
 
 #define SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID	0x80
+#define SRB_STATUS_QUEUE_FROZEN		0x40
 #define SRB_STATUS_INVALID_LUN	0x20
 #define SRB_STATUS_SUCCESS	0x01
 #define SRB_STATUS_ABORTED	0x02
 #define SRB_STATUS_ERROR	0x04
 
+#define SRB_STATUS(status) \
+	(status & ~(SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID | SRB_STATUS_QUEUE_FROZEN))
 /*
  * This is the end of Protocol specific defines.
  */
@@ -1008,7 +1011,7 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct
 	void (*process_err_fn)(struct work_struct *work);
 	bool do_work = false;
 
-	switch (vm_srb->srb_status) {
+	switch (SRB_STATUS(vm_srb->srb_status)) {
 	case SRB_STATUS_ERROR:
 		/*
 		 * If there is an error; offline the device since all