Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/mm: split store_updates_sp() in two parts in do_page_fault()

[Christophe LEROY]

Le 02/06/2017 Ã 14:11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a Ãcrit :
> On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 11:39 +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> > The difference between get_user() and __get_user() is that get_user()
> > performs an access_ok() in addition.
> >
> > Doesn't access_ok() only checks whether addr is below TASK_SIZE to
> > ensure it is a valid user address ?
>
> Do you have a measurable improvement by skipping that check ? I agree
> with your reasoning but I'm also paranoid and so I wouldn't change it
> unless it's really worth it.

No I don't have. Taking into account the patch following this serie 
which limits even more the calls to get_user(), it is probably not worth 
it anymore (see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/757564/)

I will then have to resubmit the entire serie (including that additional 
one), but there is no get_user_inatomic() so will have to either:
- do the access_ok() verification inside the function
- get back to v2 (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/756234/)
- implement an get_user_inatomic() function

What would be the best ?

Christophe