Hi Sylwester,
Here is another patch in case you decide that it is
better to apply this one.
Fix the position of the arguments in function call.^^^^^
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1248800
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1269141
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
index 1b30be72..25c7a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int s3c_camif_hw_init(struct camif_dev *camif, struct camif_vp *vp)
camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern);
if (variant->has_img_effect)
camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx,
- camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr);
+ camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb);
if (variant->ip_revision == S3C6410_CAMIF_IP_REV)
camif_hw_set_input_path(vp);
camif_cfg_video_path(vp);
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ irqreturn_t s3c_camif_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern);
if (camif->variant->has_img_effect)
camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx,
- camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr);
+ camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb);
vp->state &= ~ST_VP_CONFIG;
}
unlock: