Re: [PATCH 0/9] mfd: Remove redundant i2c_device_id

[Keerthy]

On Monday 05 June 2017 04:07 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jun 2017, Keerthy wrote:
> 
>> With the introduction of probe_new function the i2c_device_id
>> is no longer needed. Hence the remove the same and use probe_new
>> instead of probe. 
>>
>> Keerthy (9):
>>   mfd: tps65217: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65218: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: palmas: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp873x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp8788: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: lp3943: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65086: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps65090: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>   mfd: tps6586x: Remove redundant i2c_device_id
>>
>>  drivers/mfd/lp3943.c   | 11 ++---------
>>  drivers/mfd/lp873x.c   | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/lp8788.c   | 11 ++---------
>>  drivers/mfd/palmas.c   | 15 ++-------------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65090.c | 12 ++----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 14 +++-----------
>>  drivers/mfd/tps65218.c |  9 +++++----
>>  drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 12 ++----------
> 
> Are all of these drivers DT only?

At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers.
No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9.

> 
>>  9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> 
>