Re: [PATCH V1 14/15] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts in cleanup_irq

[kgunda]

On 2017-06-02 12:56, kgunda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2017-05-31 23:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> > > From: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Currently, cleanup_irq() is invoked when a peripheral's interrupt
> > > fires and there is no mapping present in the interrupt domain of
> > > spmi interrupt controller.
> > >
> > > The cleanup_irq clears the arbiter bit, clears the pmic interrupt
> > > and disables it at the pmic in that order. The last disable in
> > > cleanup_irq races with request_irq() in that it stomps over the
> > > enable issued by request_irq. Fix this by not writing to the pmic
> > > in cleanup_irq. The latched bit will be left set in the pmic,
> > > which will not send us more interrupts even if the enable bit
> > > stays enabled.
> > >
> > > When a client wants to request an interrupt, use the activate
> > > callback on the irq_domain to clear latched bit. This ensures
> > > that the latched, if set due to the above changes in cleanup_irq
> > > or when the bootloader leaves it set, gets cleaned up, paving way
> > > for upcoming interrupts to trigger.
> > >
> > > With this, there is a possibility of unwanted triggering of
> > > interrupt right after the latched bit is cleared - the interrupt
> > > may be left enabled too. To avoid that, clear the enable first
> > > followed by clearing the latched bit in the activate callback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Please squash this with the patch that adds cleanup_irq() and
> > rewrite the commit text to combine details from both.
> Sure. Will squash it in the next patch submission.
Patch that adds cleanup_irq is already taken in to the tree.
Lets have this patch as is now.