Re: [PATCH] acpi: acpica: dsutils: fixanoff-by-one index

[Seraphime Kirkovski]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:14:46PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> I believe that the rationale for this is that at that point in the code, it is *guaranteed* that there is at least one operand; therefore the -1 would always be valid.
>
> In the end, we just deleted that call to 
> acpi_db_display_argument_object.
> 
> I don't know if this change has made it into Linux yet.
> 
The latest rc actually produces the UBSAN splat in my previous message.
So I suppose, I have some buggy hardware/firmware.

Thanks,
Seraph