Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]

From: David Howells
Date: Fri Jun 16 2017 - 10:54:06 EST

Next message: Michal Hocko: "[PATCH] mm, memcg: fix potential undefined behavior in mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit"
Previous message: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] mm: Use updated pmdp_invalidate() inteface to track dirty/accessed bits"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It might be good to just introduce the internal flags field first,

Internal flags field? Did you mean Al's suggested sb_readonly() wrapper?

David

Next message: Michal Hocko: "[PATCH] mm, memcg: fix potential undefined behavior in mem_cgroup_event_ratelimit"
Previous message: Minchan Kim: "Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] mm: Use updated pmdp_invalidate() inteface to track dirty/accessed bits"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]