Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] i2c: aspeed: added driver for Aspeed I2C

[Wolfram Sang]

Hi Brendan,

here is my review. Only minor stuff, no real show-stopper.

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index 144cbadc7c72..280f84a0d7d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -326,6 +326,16 @@ config I2C_POWERMAC
>  
>  comment "I2C system bus drivers (mostly embedded / system-on-chip)"
>  
> +config I2C_ASPEED
> +	tristate "Aspeed I2C Controller"
> +	depends on ARCH_ASPEED

|| COMPILE_TEST?

> +	help
> +	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> +	  Aspeed I2C controller.
> +
> +	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> +	  will be called i2c-aspeed.
> +
>  config I2C_AT91
>  	tristate "Atmel AT91 I2C Two-Wire interface (TWI)"
>  	depends on ARCH_AT91
> +struct aspeed_i2c_bus {
> +	struct i2c_adapter		adap;
> +	struct device			*dev;
> +	void __iomem			*base;
> +	/* Synchronizes I/O mem access to base. */
> +	spinlock_t			lock;
> +	struct completion		cmd_complete;
> +	int				irq;

'irq' not really needed, I'd think.

> +	unsigned long			parent_clk_frequency;
> +	u32				bus_frequency;
> +	/* Transaction state. */
> +	enum aspeed_i2c_master_state	master_state;
> +	struct i2c_msg			*msgs;
> +	size_t				buf_index;
> +	size_t				msgs_index;
> +	size_t				msgs_count;
> +	bool				send_stop;
> +	int				cmd_err;
> +	/* Protected only by i2c_lock_bus */
> +	int				master_xfer_result;
> +};

...

> +static int aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	unsigned long time_left, flags;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 command;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> +	command = readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG);
> +
> +	if (command & ASPEED_I2CD_SDA_LINE_STS) {
> +		/* Bus is idle: no recovery needed. */
> +		if (command & ASPEED_I2CD_SCL_LINE_STS)
> +			goto out;
> +		dev_dbg(bus->dev, "bus hung (state %x), attempting recovery\n",
> +			command);
> +
> +		reinit_completion(&bus->cmd_complete);
> +		writel(ASPEED_I2CD_M_STOP_CMD, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> +
> +		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> +				&bus->cmd_complete, bus->adap.timeout);
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> +		if (time_left == 0)
> +			goto reset_out;
> +		else if (bus->cmd_err)
> +			goto reset_out;
> +		/* Recovery failed. */
> +		else if (!(readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
> +			   ASPEED_I2CD_SCL_LINE_STS))
> +			goto reset_out;
> +	/* Bus error. */
> +	} else {
> +		dev_dbg(bus->dev, "bus hung (state %x), attempting recovery\n",
> +			command);

Same dbg message as in the condition? Move it out of the 'if'?

> +
> +		reinit_completion(&bus->cmd_complete);
> +		writel(ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_RECOVER_CMD,
> +		       bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG);

Out of interest: What does the RECOVER_CMD do?

> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> +
> +		time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(
> +				&bus->cmd_complete, bus->adap.timeout);
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
> +		if (time_left == 0)
> +			goto reset_out;
> +		else if (bus->cmd_err)
> +			goto reset_out;
> +		/* Recovery failed. */
> +		else if (!(readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
> +			   ASPEED_I2CD_SDA_LINE_STS))
> +			goto reset_out;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +
> +reset_out:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return aspeed_i2c_reset(bus);
> +}

...

> +	case ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE:
> +		dev_err(bus->dev,
> +			"master received interrupt 0x%08x, but is inactive",
> +			irq_status);
> +		bus->cmd_err = -EIO;
> +		/* Do not STOP as we should be inactive. */
> +		goto out_complete;
> +	default:
> +		WARN(1, "unknown master state\n");
> +		bus->master_state = ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_INACTIVE;
> +		bus->cmd_err = -EIO;
> +		goto out_complete;
> +	}
> +error_and_stop:
> +	bus->cmd_err = -EIO;
> +	aspeed_i2c_do_stop(bus);
> +	goto out_no_complete;
> +out_complete:
> +	bus->msgs = NULL;
> +	if (bus->cmd_err)
> +		bus->master_xfer_result = bus->cmd_err;
> +	else
> +		bus->master_xfer_result = bus->msgs_index + 1;
> +	complete(&bus->cmd_complete);
> +out_no_complete:
> +	if (irq_status != status_ack)
> +		dev_err(bus->dev,
> +			"irq handled != irq. expected 0x%08x, but was 0x%08x\n",
> +			irq_status, status_ack);
> +	spin_unlock(&bus->lock);
> +	return !!irq_status;
> +}

You return in the interrupt handler -EIO always in case of errors. Can
you check Documentation/i2c/fault-codes and see if you can follow those
guidelines? Especially ENXIO on NACK and EAGAIN...

> +
> +static irqreturn_t aspeed_i2c_bus_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus = dev_id;
> +
> +	if (aspeed_i2c_master_irq(bus))
> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +	else
> +		return IRQ_NONE;

Ternary operator? Your choice, though...

And one more question: Why do you use adapter->algo_data instead of
i2c_{get|set}_adapdata?

Kind regards,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature