Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-binding: ptp: add bindings document for dte based ptp clock
From: Arun Parameswaran
Date: Mon Jun 19 2017 - 12:50:24 EST
Hi David, Rob,
I will address all of Rob's comments below.
Since a part of the patch was applied to 'net-next', would you like me to
send a new patch (based on the applied one), or a 'V2' of this patch ?
Thanks
Arun
On 17-06-18 07:04 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:26:00PM -0700, Arun Parameswaran wrote:
>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Broadcom DTE
>> PTP clock driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun Parameswaran <arun.parameswaran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/brcm,ptp-dte.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/brcm,ptp-dte.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/brcm,ptp-dte.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/brcm,ptp-dte.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..07590bc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ptp/brcm,ptp-dte.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +* Broadcom Digital Timing Engine(DTE) based PTP clock driver
>
> Bindings describe h/w, not drivers.
>
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "brcm,ptp-dte"
>
> Looks too generic. You need SoC specific compatible strings.
>
>> +- reg: address and length of the DTE block's NCO registers
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +ptp_dte: ptp_dte@180af650 {
>
> Don't use '_' in node names.
>
>> + compatible = "brcm,ptp-dte";
>> + reg = <0x180af650 0x10>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>