Re: [PATCH for v4.9 LTS 13/86] ubifs: allow encryption ioctls in compat mode

[Richard Weinberger]

Am 19.06.2017 um 19:02 schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:24:31PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote:
>> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit a75467d910135905de60b3af3f11b3693625781e ]
>>
>> The ubifs encryption ioctls did not work when called by a 32-bit program
>> on a 64-bit kernel.  Since 'struct fscrypt_policy' is not affected by
>> the word size, ubifs just needs to allow these ioctls through, like what
>> ext4 and f2fs do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/ubifs/ioctl.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> index 3c7b29de0ca7..49d6c0f89c50 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -197,6 +197,9 @@ long ubifs_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>  	case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS:
>>  		cmd = FS_IOC_SETFLAGS;
>>  		break;
>> +	case FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
>> +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
>> +		break;
>>  	default:
>>  		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
>>  	}
> 
> UBIFS encryption was merged in 4.10, so this isn't needed in 4.9.

Yep. I wonder why this patch made it into the stable queue?

Thanks,
//richard