Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler
From: Shubham Bansal
Date: Mon Jun 19 2017 - 21:35:00 EST
> Sorry, had a travel over the weekend, so didn't read it in time.
> What is the issue with imitating in JIT what the interpreter is
> doing as a starting point? That should be generic enough to handle
> any case.
> Otherwise you'd need some sort of reverse mapping since verifier
> already converted BPF_CALL insns into relative helper addresses
> in imm part.
Sorry but I don't get what you are trying to say. Can you explain it
with an example?