Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Call driver's noirq callbacks

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Tue Jun 20 2017 - 08:47:36 EST


On 20 June 2017 at 14:05, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently genpd installs its own suspend_noirq and resume_noirq
> callbacks, but never calls down to the driver's corresponding
> callbacks. Add these calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index d3f1d96f75e9..c3b6e6018c02 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -925,6 +925,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

Two things:
1) I would move this a couple of lines further above, as to avoid
pm_runtime_force_suspend() from being called before, as it may suspend
the device before the noirq callbacks gets to run.
2) pm_genpd_suspend_noirq() is also assigned to the ->poweroff_noirq()
callback. Certainly we don't want run the *suspend* variants of the
callback, but rather the *poweroff* variants in that case.

> +
> genpd_lock(genpd);
> genpd->suspended_count++;
> genpd_sync_power_off(genpd, true, 0);
> @@ -958,6 +962,10 @@ static int pm_genpd_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> genpd->suspended_count--;
> genpd_unlock(genpd);
>
> + ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
> ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>

Kind regards
Uffe