Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] xen/pvcalls: implement accept command

[Boris Ostrovsky]

>  static void __pvcalls_back_accept(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> +	struct sockpass_mapping *mappass = container_of(
> +		work, struct sockpass_mapping, register_work);
> +	struct sock_mapping *map;
> +	struct pvcalls_ioworker *iow;
> +	struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata;
> +	struct socket *sock;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> +	int notify;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	fedata = mappass->fedata;
> +	/*
> +	 * __pvcalls_back_accept can race against pvcalls_back_accept.
> +	 * We only need to check the value of "cmd" on read. It could be
> +	 * done atomically, but to simplify the code on the write side, we
> +	 * use a spinlock.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +	req = &mappass->reqcopy;
> +	if (req->cmd != PVCALLS_ACCEPT) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +
> +	sock = sock_alloc();
> +	if (sock == NULL)
> +		goto out_error;
> +	sock->type = mappass->sock->type;
> +	sock->ops = mappass->sock->ops;
> +
> +	ret = inet_accept(mappass->sock, sock, O_NONBLOCK, true);
> +	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> +		sock_release(sock);
> +		goto out_error;
> +	}
> +
> +	map = pvcalls_new_active_socket(fedata,
> +					req->u.accept.id_new,
> +					req->u.accept.ref,
> +					req->u.accept.evtchn,
> +					sock);
> +	if (!map) {
> +		sock_release(sock);
> +		goto out_error;

Again, lost ret value.

> +	}
> +
> +	map->sockpass = mappass;
> +	iow = &map->ioworker;
> +	atomic_inc(&map->read);
> +	atomic_inc(&map->io);
> +	queue_work(iow->wq, &iow->register_work);
> +
> +out_error:
> +	rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&fedata->ring, fedata->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> +	rsp->req_id = req->req_id;
> +	rsp->cmd = req->cmd;
> +	rsp->u.accept.id = req->u.accept.id;
> +	rsp->ret = ret;
> +	RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&fedata->ring, notify);
> +	if (notify)
> +		notify_remote_via_irq(fedata->irq);
> +
> +	mappass->reqcopy.cmd = 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void pvcalls_pass_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sock)
>  {
> +	struct sockpass_mapping *mappass = sock->sk_user_data;
> +
> +	if (mappass == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	queue_work(mappass->wq, &mappass->register_work);
>  }
>  
>  static int pvcalls_back_bind(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> @@ -383,6 +456,43 @@ static int pvcalls_back_listen(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  static int pvcalls_back_accept(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  			       struct xen_pvcalls_request *req)
>  {
> +	struct pvcalls_fedata *fedata;
> +	struct sockpass_mapping *mappass;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;

Unnecessary initialization.

-boris

> +	struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	fedata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> +
> +	mappass = radix_tree_lookup(&fedata->socketpass_mappings,
> +		req->u.accept.id);
> +	if (mappass == NULL)
> +		goto out_error;
> +
> +	/* 
> +	 * Limitation of the current implementation: only support one
> +	 * concurrent accept or poll call on one socket.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +	if (mappass->reqcopy.cmd != 0) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +		ret = -EINTR;
> +		goto out_error;
> +	}
> +
> +	mappass->reqcopy = *req;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mappass->copy_lock, flags);
> +	queue_work(mappass->wq, &mappass->register_work);
> +
> +	/* Tell the caller we don't need to send back a notification yet */
> +	return -1;
> +
> +out_error:
> +	rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&fedata->ring, fedata->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++);
> +	rsp->req_id = req->req_id;
> +	rsp->cmd = req->cmd;
> +	rsp->u.accept.id = req->u.accept.id;
> +	rsp->ret = ret;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>