Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

From: Shubham Bansal
Date: Wed Jun 21 2017 - 15:37:22 EST

Hi Daniel,

Good news. Got the CALL to work.

[ 145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]

Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get
accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of
days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is

Shubham Bansal

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:26 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> [...]
>> So ultimately, we call helper_function which takes u64 as arguments
>> only. I know its asking a lot, but can you please confirm this asap? I
>> would like to start implementing it.
> Yes, that is correct. I think it would be the better, more generic
> approach going forward to always assume that.