Re: [PATCH v5 27/28] ext4: xattr inode deduplication

From: Tahsin Erdogan
Date: Wed Jun 21 2017 - 17:34:24 EST


> Tashin, we are already using the "no_mbcache" option name, so would prefer
> to keep that working. It would be OK to accept both option names to mean
> the same thing, and only document the "nombcache" option.

Updated patch to accept both nombcache and no_mbcache.

>> struct mb_cache *s_mb_cache;
>> + struct mb_cache *s_ea_inode_cache;
>
> These names should be consistent, like "s_ea_block_cache".

Yes, I will rename this to s_ea_block_cache.

>> #define EXT4_GET_MB_CACHE(inode) (((struct ext4_sb_info *) \
>> inode->i_sb->s_fs_info)->s_mb_cache)
>>
>> +#define EA_INODE_CACHE(inode) (((struct ext4_sb_info *) \
>> + inode->i_sb->s_fs_info)->s_ea_inode_cache)
>
> These names should be consistent, like EXT4_GET_EA_CACHE() or maybe
> EXT4_GET_EA_BLOCK_CACHE() and EXT4_GET_EA_INODE_CACHE().

How about EA_BLOCK_CACHE() and EA_INODE_CACHE() to keep them short?