Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: scsi: ufs: add document for hi3660-ufs

[Bu Tao]

å 2017/6/22 19:51, Arnd Bergmann åé:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Bu Tao <butao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > å 2017/6/17 5:51, Arnd Bergmann åé:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Bu Tao <butao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > +Optional properties for board device:
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-use-rate-B                : specifies UFS rate-B
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-broken-fastauto   : specifies no fastauto
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-use-HS-GEAR3      : specifies UFS HS-GEAR3
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-use-HS-GEAR2      : specifies UFS HS-GEAR2
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-use-HS-GEAR1      : specifies UFS HS-GEAR1
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-broken-clk-gate-bypass    : specifies no clk-gate
> > > > +- ufs-hi3660-use-one-line      : specifies UFS use one line work
> > > > +- reset-gpio                   : specifies to reset devices
> > >
> > >
> > > Some of these sound rather generic and might apply to UFS implementations
> > > other than hi3660, so I'd suggest adding them to the base ufs binding with
> > > a generic name instead.
> > >
> > > Any DT properties that might be useful across multiple implementations
> > > should be parsed in generic code that gets called by the individual
> > > drivers,
> > > and then the properties that are specific to the integration work done by
> > > hisilicon should be prefixed with "hisilicon,", but not normally with the
> > > SoC name: it is quite possible that another SoC will be derived from this
> > > chip and it should reuse the properties.
> >
> >
> > I do not know wheher other SoC need to use the optional properties as
> > abover. So here the name of the optional properties has "hi3660".
>
> They should not have "hi3660" in their names either way, independent
> of where they are used.

Oh, change the "hi3660" to "hisilicon"?
e.g. ufs-hi3660-use-rate-B  -->  ufs-hisilicon-use-rate-B
> > > (note: this is different from the value of the "compatible" property that
> > > is meant to be as specific as possible".
> > >
> > > Also, please clarify how your binding relates to the ufshcd binding
> > > in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt: does
> > > hi3660 implement any registers that are shared with ufshcd, or does
> > > it use the same physical interface with a different register set?
> >
> > No, only show how to use the dt-binding for hi3660 SoC
>
> My question was about the hardware: does hi3660 implement ufshcd
> or not?

YES
>       Arnd