Re: [PATCH 0/3] some scheduler code movements
From: Nicolas Pitre
Date: Thu Jun 22 2017 - 08:33:39 EST
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I've applied the first patch to the scheduler tree yesterday, but the other
> > > changes unfortunately conflicted with other pending scheduler work - could
> > > you please re-post the other 3 patches on top of tip:sched/core?
> > Sure, here they are.
> Hm, what tree is this against? First patch won't apply to the latest
> patching file kernel/sched/core.c
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 5253 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 5285.
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 5581 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 6485 (offset 1 line).
> 1 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched/core.c
That's against my copy of tip/sched/core as of yesterday:
Author: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 14 19:37:30 2017 -0700
Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Tue Jun 20 12:48:37 2017 +0200
sched/core: Drop the unused try_get_task_struct() helper function
on which I pre-applied my previous patch #1/4 ("cpuset/sched: cpuset
makes sense for SMP only") you said having already applied on your side
but that didn't show up in the publicly visible sched/core yet.