Re: [PATCH] qla2xxx: Protect access to qpair members with qpair->qp_lock

From: Johannes Thumshirn
Date: Thu Jun 22 2017 - 10:23:33 EST


On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:19:27PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 22/06/2017 14:43, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >In qla2xx_start_scsi_mq() and qla2xx_dif_start_scsi_mq() we grab the
> >qpair->qp_lock but do access members of the qpair before having the lock.
> >Re-order the locking sequence to have all read and write access to qpair
> >members under the qpair->qp_lock.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>
> >---
> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> >index 8404f17f3c6c..425ca1646a9a 100644
> >--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> >@@ -1770,10 +1770,6 @@ qla2xxx_start_scsi_mq(srb_t *sp)
> > struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
> > struct qla_qpair *qpair = sp->qpair;
> >
> >- /* Setup qpair pointers */
> >- rsp = qpair->rsp;
> >- req = qpair->req;
>
> Can you check the call to qla2x00_marker() before the spinlock grab, which
> takes rsp and req as parameters?

Good catch, thanks.

--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850