Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] [media] ov9650: add device tree support

[Sakari Ailus]

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:46:34PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > Am 26.06.2017 um 18:31 schrieb Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>:
> > 
> > Hi Hugues,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:05:38PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> >> @@ -1545,15 +1577,22 @@ static int ov965x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> >> }
> >> 
> >> static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
> >> -	{ "OV9650", 0 },
> >> -	{ "OV9652", 0 },
> >> +	{ "OV9650", 0x9650 },
> >> +	{ "OV9652", 0x9652 },
> > 
> > This change does not appear to match with the patch description nor it the
> > information is used. How about not changing it, unless there's a reason to?
> > The same for the data field of the of_device_id array below.
> 
> I think it could/should be used to check if the camera chip that is found
> by reading the product-id and version registers does match what the device
> tree expects and abort probing on a mismatch.

Makes sense. But it should be a separate patch, shouldn't it?

You could also put the id to the ops struct, and choose the ops struct that
way. Entirely up to you.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx	XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx