Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

From: Robert Richter
Date: Tue Jun 27 2017 - 09:56:40 EST


On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> From: Geetha Sowjanya <geethasowjanya.akula@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
> lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.
>
> New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
> share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

> +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + int ret, irq;
> + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
> +
> + /* Disable IRQs first */
> + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
> + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + irq = smmu->combined_irq;
> + if (irq) {
> + /*
> + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
> + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
> + */
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
> + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
> + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,

Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node
system now:

[ 17.403260] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.0.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.408853] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.0.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.417259] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.1.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.422856] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.1.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.431193] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.2.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.436787] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.2.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.445123] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.450697] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.458984] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 5. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.610636] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: failed to enable combined irq
[ 17.617491] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.623073] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.631339] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 6. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.782944] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: failed to enable combined irq
[ 17.789780] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.795367] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.803640] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 7. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.955248] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: failed to enable combined irq

In __setup_irq() in kernel/irq/manage.c there is a check if that flag
is set which causes the error is shown.

-Robert

> + "arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq", smmu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable combined irq\n");
> + } else
> + arm_smmu_setup_unique_irqs(smmu);
> +
> + if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)
> + irqen_flags |= IRQ_CTRL_PRIQ_IRQEN;
>
> /* Enable interrupt generation on the SMMU */
> ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, irqen_flags,