Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
From: Shawn Lin
Date: Wed Jun 28 2017 - 08:41:45 EST
Hi
On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Klaus,
[added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
Rockchip RK3399.
It provides the following feature set:
* up to 4GB DDR3
* on-module SPI-NOR flash
* on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
* SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
* Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
* HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
* 2x MIPI-CSI
* USB
- 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
- 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
* on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
- low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
- fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
- USB<->CAN bridge controller
I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]
+ leds {
+ compatible = "gpio-leds";
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+
+ module_led {
phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
+ label = "module_led";
+ gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
+ panic-indicator;
+ };
+
+ sd_card_led {
+ label = "sd_card_led";
+ gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
+ };
+ };
+
+ cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
+ compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+ opp-shared;
+
+ opp00 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <800000>;
+ clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
+ };
+ opp01 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <800000>;
+ };
+ opp02 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <830000>;
this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
+ opp-suspend;
+ };
+ opp03 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <880000>;
same as above
+ };
+ opp04 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <950000>;
+ };
+ opp05 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
same as above
+ };
+ opp06 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
+ };
+ opp07 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
+ };
+ opp08 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
+ opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
+ turbo-mode;
Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
+ };
+ };
+
+ clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ clock-frequency = <125000000>;
+ clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ };
+
+ vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
+ };
+
+ vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
long run to find and fix things as they occur.
This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
+ regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
+
+ vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
+ regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
+ vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
+ };
+
+ vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+ };
+
+ vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ };
This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
together with other regulators in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
in their naming and also hierarchy.
(debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
This of course applies to all defined regulators.
If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
nevermind this comment ;-) .
+
+ vdd_log: vdd-log {
+ compatible = "pwm-regulator";
+ pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
+ regulator-name = "vdd_log";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+};
+&i2c0 {
+ status = "okay";
+ i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
+ i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
+ clock-frequency = <400000>;
+
+ vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
node names should be generic (aka device category)
+ compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
+ reg = <0x60>;
+ vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
+ vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
+ regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
deprecated property and not really needed.
+ regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
+ regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
+ fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
+ regulator-always-on;
+ regulator-boot-on;
+};
[...]
+&pcie0 {
+ ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ num-lanes = <4>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
+ status = "okay";
vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
+};
+
[...]
+&sdmmc {
+ clock-frequency = <150000000>;
we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
+ bus-width = <4>;
+ cap-mmc-highspeed;
+ cap-sd-highspeed;
+ cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
+ wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ num-slots = <1>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
+ status = "okay";
+};
And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
supply if possible.
+
+
double empty line
+&spi1 {
+ status = "okay";
+
+ flash: norflash@0 {
norflash: flash@0 maybe?
You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
the specific name might be more helpful.
+ compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
+ reg = <0>;
+ spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
+ };
+};
+&pinctrl {
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
+
+ hog {
+ puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin