Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: don't alias ____ptr

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2017-06-28 14:15:18 [+0300], Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > > The main problem here is that arch_cmpxchg64_local() calls cmpxhg_local() instead of using arch_cmpxchg_local().
> > > 
> > > So, the patch bellow should fix the problem, also this will fix double instrumentation of cmpcxchg64[_local]().
> > > But I haven't tested this patch yet.
> > 
> > tested, works. Next step?
> 
> Check all other implementations in every architecture whether there is a
> similar problem .....
> 
> But this really want's a proper cleanup unless we want to waste the time
> over and over again with the next hard to figure out macro expansion fail.
> 
> First of all, cmpxchg64[_local]() can be implemented as inlines right away.
> 
> For cmpxchg*(), the situation is slightly different, but the sizeof()
> evaluation should be done at the top most level, even if we do it further
> down in the low level arch/asm-generic implementation once more.
> 
> Something along the lines of:
> 
> static inline unsigned long cmpxchg_varsize(void *ptr, unsigned long old,
> 					    unsigned long new, int size)
> {
> 	switch (size) {
> 	case 1:
> 	case 2:
> 	case 4:
> 		break;
> 	case 8:
> 		if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 8)
> 			break;
> 	default:
> 		BUILD_BUG_ON(1);
> 	}
> 	kasan_check(ptr, size);
> 	return arch_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new);
> }
> 
> #define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n)						\
> ({									\
> 	((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_varsize((ptr), (unsigned long)(o), \
> 			     (unsigned long)(n), sizeof(*(ptr))));	\
> })
> 
> That's the first step to cure the actual mess.
> 
> Ideally we get rid of that whole macro maze and convert everything to
> proper inlines with actual cmpxchg8/16/32/64() variants, but that's going
> to take some time. As an intermediate step we can at least propagate 'size'
> to arch_cmpxchg(), which is not that much of an effort.

And to be honest. That should have be done in the first place _BEFORE_
adding that atomic-instrumented stuff. I'm tempted to revert that mess
instead of 'fixing' it half arsed.

As a side note, we have files (aside of x86/asm/atomic.h) which include
asm/cmpxchg.h ...

net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
arch/x86/um/asm/barrier.h:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>

I'm really tired of all this featuritis crammed into the code without much
thought. Dammit, can we please stop this and clean up the existing mess
first before duct taping more mess on top of it.

Thanks,

	tglx