Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:51:08AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 2017-06-21 08:29, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >> On 2017-06-20 13:38, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>> On 2017-06-20 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> This makes the gpio-exar driver usable, which was prevented by a number
>> >>>>>> of fatal bugs, and adds support for the SIMATIC IOT2040 to the 8250-exar
>> >>>>>> driver and, indirectly, to gpio-exar as well. It's a cross-subsystem
>> >>>>>> series, so I'm also cross-posting to the serial and gpio lists.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Changes in v6:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I merged some of the patches, that applied. Let's see if they survive
>> >>>>> in linux-next, else I guess we need to fix this in the -rcs or for the next
>> >>>>> kernel cycle.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Weird that things did not apply. I just did a cherry-pick for all those
>> >>>> 10 patches on top of 5c996b7eb52c, and that went smoothly. Please let me
>> >>>> know which baseline is needed, and I will rebase.
>> >>>
>> >>> This was on the "devel" branch of my GPIO tree:
>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=devel
>> >>
>> >> Again, all (missing) patches applied absolutely cleanly for me, see
>> >>
>> >> http://git.kiszka.org/?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/queues/gpio-iot2000
>> >
>> > I've rebased over devel and noticed along this that you will have to
>> > include "serial: uapi: Add support for bus termination" from Greg's
>> > tty-next for the last patch to avoid breaking the build. Result pushed to
>> >
>> > http://git.kiszka.org/?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/queues/gpio-iot2000
>> >
>> > If you want me to resend anything, just let me know. Would be great to
>> > have the remaining pieces lined up in time for the next merge window.
>>
>> I could just pull it in, but then I want a clear indication that Greg and
>> say Andy are happy with this.
>>
>> The serial patches are missing Gregs explicit ACK and the platform
>> patch could use Andy's ACK. The last patch adding the
>> IOT2040 is so obviously out of my GPIO territory that I want
>> Greg 100% aligned with this.
>>
>> I am sorry that it is troublesome when things cross subsystem
>> boundaries, I already stretched it a bit with the things I queued
>> up because it annoys me too, but this is the process we have :/
>
> I've added my acks to the serial patches, so all should be fine for you
> to take this all through your tree now.

Awesome, Jan can you:

- Collect the ACKs

- Send me a pull request based on my devel branch?

Yours,
Linus Walleij