Re: [PATCH ALT4 V2 1/2] audit: show fstype:pathname for entries with anonymous parents
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jun 29 2017 - 19:58:39 EST
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:21:22 -0400
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Looking at this again today, why would we want to clear name->dentry
> > in audit_copy_inode() if it is already set? Does that ever happen?
> > I'm not sure it does ...
>
> It has been nearly 3 months since I coded that, so I'll have to dive in
> and re-analyse what I was thinking at that time. I think that rationale
> was that if audit_copy_inode() is called again on that audit_name struct
> that it could be called by audit_log_link_denied() or __audit_inode()
> not needing the dentry reference or even by __audit_inode_child() and
> have it replaced, needing a reference count correction.
>
Just a note. If after 3 months you need to re-analyze, you either need
to design things simpler, or have better comments in the code.
-- Steve