Re: [patch 1/5] pinctrl: samsung: Remove bogus irq_[un]mask from resource management

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The irq chip callbacks irq_request/release_resources() have absolutely no
> > business with masking and unmasking the irq.
> >
> > The core code unmasks the interrupt after complete setup and masks it
> > before invoking irq_release_resources().
> >
> > The unmask is actually harmful as it happens before the interrupt is
> > completely initialized in __setup_irq().
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Fixes: f6a8249f9e55 ("pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as EINTs")
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Does this patch have a dependency on the rest of the series or should
> I just apply it as-is?

Has no dependecies at all.