Re: [RFC][PATCHv3 2/5] printk: introduce printing kernel thread

[Tetsuo Handa]

Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/30/17 19:18), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > I'm still thinking about Steven's proposals; but we will need offloading
> > > anyways, so the bits we are talking about here are important regardless
> > > the direction printk design will take, I think.
> > 
> > Is there a chance that printk() waits for only data queued by that printk()
> > call (exception will be printk() from NMI).
> 
> hm, I don't think this can be done easily... consider
> 
> 	console_lock();
> 	printk();
> 	printk();
> 	...			-> this guys will wait forever. nothing
> 				   flushes the logbuf.
> 	printk();
> 	console_unlock();

Can't we remove console_lock()/console_unlock() from printk() ?
I think that printk() depends on console_unlock() is complicating.