Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On 6/30/17 9:44 AM, Edward Cree wrote:
> I haven't measured the test_progs ones, because I *still* haven't gotten
>  around to actually setting up a BPF toolchain (it doesn't help that I'm
>  building everything on a test server that gets reimaged every night to
>  run our nightly tests...).

then you're missing a lot of tests then...
installing llvm is trivial. On x86 there are plenty of pre-built
packages that you can apt-get or yum.
Dave had to compile llvm and gcc from source on sparc, so volatile test
server isn't really an excuse to miss all these tests ;)
especially for such large verifier change.