On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Janusz LisieckiDone. I hope my message is more verbose and clear this time.
<janusz.lisiecki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
W dniu 2017-07-02 o 21:38, Luc Van Oostenryck pisze:Fine, but then please put this explanation in the commit message.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Janusz LisieckiAs I see in ks_hostif.c all assignments to link_ap_info_t->capability threat
<janusz.lisiecki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch fixes the following Sparse warnings in ks_wlan_net.c:It could be that it's ap->capability's type that is wrong (not
drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c:1359:24: warning: cast to restricted
__le16
Both sides of assignment are u16 so (as 'ap' is local_ap_t type and
'capability' member,
have the same as local 'capabilities' type of u16) 'le16_to_cpu' is not
needed
annotated with __le16).
Isn't it?
Is ap->capability supposed to hold a little-endian value or a native
order value?
-- Luc
this value as native order (i.e get_ap_information, get_current_ap). As this
is not a structure which comes from HW we can do the way you suggested.
Still, as all other places in code threats this as native order value I
decided to change only one place than many other around to fix Sparse
warning.
In others words, be very clear that the change is because ap->capability is in
native order and thus the conversion le16_to_cpu() is wrong and must be removed.
-- Luc