On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:27:18PM -0500, Christopher Bostic wrote:
Maybe add 'aspeed,reset-type = "none"' ? The default (no property) would
On 7/6/17 9:35 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:04:17AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:OK I'll update to this method.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 08:39:59AM -0500, Christopher Bostic wrote:I tend to agree with Guenter.
On 6/28/17 10:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:The same can be accomplished with "aspeed,no-reset", which would avoid the, in
On 06/28/2017 05:28 PM, Christopher Bostic wrote:True, that should be documented. Will add that.
Describe device tree optional properties:Is this correct ? As I understand the datasheet, it could also used in
* aspeed,arm-reet - ARM CPU reset on signal
* aspeed,no-soc-reset - SOC reset on signal
* aspeed,no-sys-reset - System reset on signal
* aspeed,interrupt - Interrupt CPU on signal
* aspeed,external-signal - Generate external signal (WDT1 and WDT2
only)
* aspeed,alt-boot - Boot from alternate block on signal
Signed-off-by: Christopher Bostic <cbostic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3 - Invert soc and sys reset to 'no' to preserve backwards
compatibility. SOC and SYS reset will be set by default
without any optional parameters set
v2 - Add 'aspeed,' prefix to all optional properties
- Add arm-reset, soc-reset, interrupt, alt-boot properties
---
.../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt | 24
++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt
index c5e74d7..6f18005 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt
@@ -8,9 +8,33 @@ Required properties:
- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
mapped
region
+Optional properties:
+ Signal behavior - Whenever a timeout occurs the watchdog can be
programmed
+ to generate/not generate 6 types of signals:
+
+ - aspeed,arm-reset: If property is present then reset ARM CPU only.
+ If not specified no ARM CPU reset is done.
+
+ - aspeed,no-soc-reset: If property is present then do not reset SOC.
+ If not specified then SOC reset is done.
+
+ - aspeed,no-sys-reset: If property is present then do not reset
system.
+ Typcally used in tandem with 'aspeed-external-signal'
tandem with
aspeed,interrupt.
As the aspeed watchdog driver exists prior to this change an SOC reset is+ If not specified then system reset is done.I'll leave it up to Rob to decide, but for my part I don't understand
+
no-soc-reset.
done by
default. In order to preserve backwards compatibility a missing optional
property
should result in default behavior. I however need to be able to specify
that SOC
reset be disabled in some way. This goes back to our discussion about why
we'd
ever want to disable SYSTEM reset in the first place. Same reasoning
applies for
SOC reset.
I would instead use four properties.Per my response above I think it should remain as aspeed,no-soc-reset due to
aspeed,arm-reset
aspeed,soc-reset
backwards compatibility requirements.
my opinion, awkward "no-{sys,soc}-reset" poperties.
Or "aspeed,no-reset".aspeed,sys-reset (which is the default)Again as per our discussion yesterday I need some way to specify how system
reset is to be done. For backwards compatibility, a lack of parameter here
would
result in a system reset being configured. Only way to indicate to the
driver
that no system reset is to be done is to indicate 'no' system reset in the
optional
parameter.
{arm,soc,sys}-reset are mutually exclusive per datasheet, and there is aaspeed,no-resetThis parameter seems ambiguous as we could be doing a 'no system reset'
or a 'no SOC reset' in theory.
separate configuration bit which enables the reset in the first place.
I don't see how that is ambiguous.
Anyway, I don't think we are making any progress here. Let's wait for
guidance from Rob.
Maybe using the form 'aspeed,reset-type = "cpu|soc|system"' would be
more aligned to the type of reset being mutually exclusive.
then be "system".
Thanks,
Guenter