[PATCH] libnvdimm: fix badblock range handling of ARS range

From: Toshi Kani
Date: Fri Jul 07 2017 - 19:53:40 EST


__add_badblock_range() does not account sector alignment when
it sets 'num_sectors'. Therefore, an ARS error record range
spanning across two sectors is set to a single sector length,
which leaves the 2nd sector unprotected.

Change __add_badblock_range() to set 'num_sectors' properly.

Fixes: 0caeef63e6d2f866d85bb507bf63e0ce8ec91cef
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nvdimm/core.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/core.c b/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
index 2dee908..932c3994 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
@@ -421,14 +421,15 @@ static void set_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int num)
static void __add_badblock_range(struct badblocks *bb, u64 ns_offset, u64 len)
{
const unsigned int sector_size = 512;
- sector_t start_sector;
+ sector_t start_sector, end_sector;
u64 num_sectors;
u32 rem;

start_sector = div_u64(ns_offset, sector_size);
- num_sectors = div_u64_rem(len, sector_size, &rem);
+ end_sector = div_u64_rem(ns_offset + len, sector_size, &rem);
if (rem)
- num_sectors++;
+ end_sector++;
+ num_sectors = end_sector - start_sector;

if (unlikely(num_sectors > (u64)INT_MAX)) {
u64 remaining = num_sectors;