Re: [PATCH 8/8] Staging: lustre :lustre: include :lustre_compat.h: Prefer using the BIT macro

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:43:15PM +0530, Jaya Durga wrote:
> Replace all instances of (1 << 27) with BIT(27) to fix
> checkpatch check messages
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaya Durga <rjdurga@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> index da9ce19..686a251 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_compat.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
>   * set ATTR_BLOCKS to a high value to avoid any risk of collision with other
>   * ATTR_* attributes (see bug 13828)
>   */
> -#define ATTR_BLOCKS    (1 << 27)
> +#define ATTR_BLOCKS    BIT(27)

Isn't this used in lustre's userspace code?  If so, you can't use the
BIT() macro there :(

Please check before you redo this.

thanks,

greg k-h