Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] x86: ORC unwinder (previously undwarf)
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jul 13 2017 - 03:13:17 EST
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> If you want perf to be able to use ORC instead of DWARF for user space
> binaries, that's not currently possible, though I don't see any
> technical blockers for doing so. Perf would need to be taught to read
> ORC data.
So the problem with userspace stuff is that the unwind data isn't
readily available from NMI context.
So the kernel unwinder will trigger a fault and abort.
The very best we can hope for is using the EH [*] stuff that all
binaries actually have _and_ map. The only problem is that most programs
don't actually use the EH stuff much so while its mapped, its not
actually paged in, so we're still stuck.
[*] C++ ABI requires EH bits for stack unwinding for exception handling
and the like, and because C++ can unwind through C code, C ABI also
mandates EH bits be present.
ORC doesn't much change this. What is currently an option is for perf to
simply copy out the top n-Kb of the stack for each sample (talk about
expensive) and then have userspace unwind it. And for userspace
unwinding in userspace, libunwind and the like are fine, I see absolutely
no reason to use ORC bits here.