Re: [RFC V2 4/6] cpufreq: Use transition_delay_us for legacy governors as well
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Jul 13 2017 - 12:31:17 EST
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The policy->transition_delay_us field is used only by the schedutil
> governor currently, and this field describes how fast the driver wants
> the cpufreq governor to change CPUs frequency. It should rather be a
> common thing across all governors, as it doesn't have any schedutil
> dependency here.
>
> Create a new helper cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us() to get the
> transition delay across all governors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 9 +--------
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 11 +----------
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 858081f9c3d7..eed069ecfd5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,6 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
> struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
> - unsigned int latency;
> int ret = 0;
>
> /* State should be equivalent to EXIT */
> @@ -428,13 +427,7 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (ret)
> goto free_policy_dbs_info;
>
> - /* policy latency is in ns. Convert it to us first */
> - latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / 1000;
> - if (latency == 0)
> - latency = 1;
> -
> - /* Bring kernel and HW constraints together */
> - dbs_data->sampling_rate = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER * latency;
> + dbs_data->sampling_rate = cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(policy);
>
> if (!have_governor_per_policy())
> gov->gdbs_data = dbs_data;
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 00e4c40a3249..14f0ab61ed17 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,21 @@ static inline void cpufreq_policy_apply_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int
> +cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + unsigned int delay_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER, latency;
> +
> + if (policy->transition_delay_us)
> + return policy->transition_delay_us;
> +
> + latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> + if (latency)
> + delay_us *= latency;
> +
> + return delay_us;
> +}
Not in the header, please, and I don't think you need delay_us:
latency = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
if (latency)
return latency * LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
return LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
Thanks,
Rafael