Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: sunxi: Improve endpoint ID scheme readability
From: Maxime Ripard
Date: Mon Jul 17 2017 - 02:21:11 EST
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:38:38AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:48:00PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:30:16PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> >> The explanation for the endpoint ID numbering scheme is convoluted
> >> >> and hard to understand.
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch aims to improve the readability of it by combining the
> >> >> existing two paragraphs, while also providing a diagram example,
> >> >> and how endpoints should be numbered based on that example.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope this helps. I'm not sure I can improve this even more without
> >> >> spelling out all cases.
> >> >>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> .../bindings/display/sunxi/sun4i-drm.txt | 36 ++++++++++++++++------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Maxime, this patch seems to have fallen through the cracks.
> >>
> >> Could you queue it as a fix for 4.13?
> >
> > Sorry, I don't know why I overlooked it.
> >
> > Is it really 4.13 material though? It doesn't look that urgent.
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, this clarifies the numbering scheme introduced
> in 4.13. I'd say that's enough reason to have it in the same release.
>
> But I should update the diagram first. The backend <-> TCON mux is
> missing. And maybe a Fixes tag.
If it's just clarification, I don't think we should push it as a fix,
but and it can definitely wait.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature