Re: [PATCH v1 00/25] lib, rtc: Print rtc_time via %pt[dt][rv]
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Jul 18 2017 - 13:57:03 EST
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:50 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 16:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Recently I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that
> > printing
> > its content field by field.
> >
> > In this series I introduce %pt[dt][rv] specifier to make life a bit
> > easier.
>
> Hey Andy.
>
> I just saw a patch with a printk for rtc time from Mark Salyzyn.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/18/885
Same!
> Any idea if you want to push this extension?
Yes, just really lack of time for everything.
I like the idea to make it conditional (config BLABLABLA). It will
address some comments about footprint for no users.
> I like the concept and still think it could be extended a bit more.
>
> from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/8/1134
>
> My preference would be for %pt[type]<output style>
> where <type> is mandatory and could be:
>
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂr for struct rtc_time
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ6 for time64_t
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂk for ktime_t
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂT for struct timespec64
> ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂetc
I dunno about this.
However, I like this more than do conversion in each case where input
reference has different type.
> and <output style> has an unspecified default of
> YYYY-MM-DD:hh:mm:ss
I'm against this, sorry. Too many variations for almost no use (users).
> Perhaps use the "date" formats without the leading
> % uses for <output style> for additional styles.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy