Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: chipidea: Hook into mux framework to toggle usb switch
From: Peter Chen
Date: Tue Jul 18 2017 - 22:06:14 EST
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 06:47:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2017-07-17 21:41:11)
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -175,6 +176,10 @@ static int host_start(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > if (ci_otg_is_fsm_mode(ci)) {
> > > otg->host = &hcd->self;
> > > hcd->self.otg_port = 1;
> > > + } else {
> > > + ret = mux_control_select(ci->platdata->usb_switch, 1);
> >
> > It is better to use MACRO for 1 and 0.
> >
>
> Ok.
>
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto disable_reg;
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -195,6 +200,8 @@ static void host_stop(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > struct usb_hcd *hcd = ci->hcd;
> > >
> > > if (hcd) {
> > > + if (!ci_otg_is_fsm_mode(ci))
> > > + mux_control_deselect(ci->platdata->usb_switch);
> > > if (ci->platdata->notify_event)
> > > ci->platdata->notify_event(ci,
> > > CI_HDRC_CONTROLLER_STOPPED_EVENT);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > > index d68b125796f9..deb18099e168 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
> > > #include <linux/usb/otg-fsm.h>
> > > #include <linux/usb/chipidea.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mux/consumer.h>
> > >
> > > #include "ci.h"
> > > #include "udc.h"
> > > @@ -1964,16 +1965,26 @@ void ci_hdrc_gadget_destroy(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > >
> > > static int udc_id_switch_for_device(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> > > {
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > if (ci->is_otg)
> > > /* Clear and enable BSV irq */
> > > hw_write_otgsc(ci, OTGSC_BSVIS | OTGSC_BSVIE,
> > > OTGSC_BSVIS | OTGSC_BSVIE);
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + if (!ci_otg_is_fsm_mode(ci))
> > > + ret = mux_control_select(ci->platdata->usb_switch, 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (ci->is_otg && ret)
> > > + hw_write_otgsc(ci, OTGSC_BSVIE | OTGSC_BSVIS, OTGSC_BSVIS);
> >
> > Should use !ret?
> >
>
> No? This is intended to unwind the clearing and enabling of the BSV irq
> on failure (ret is non-zero) and so we clear and disable the BSV irq.
I see now, I did not notice we have already enabled BSV above.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen