Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> > > On Fri, 09 Jun 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andy,
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:59:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Rajmohan Mani
> > > > > <rajmohan.mani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that
> > > > > > > powers a Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for
> > > > > > > image sensors, drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates
> > > > > > > two LED drivers for general purpose indicators.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I dunno why you decide to send this out now, see my comments
> > below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct tps68470 *tps) {
> > > > > > > +       unsigned int version;
> > > > > > > +       int ret;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +       /* FIXME: configure these dynamically */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, what prevents you to fix this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing I suppose. They're however not needed right now and can be
> > > > > implemented later on if they're ever needed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ack
> > >
> > > What does this mean?  Is the plan to fix it or not?  I don't want
> > > FIXMEs in the code that a) can be fixed right away or b) might never be
> > fixed.
> > >
> > 
> > I meant that this can be implemented later on, if there's a need.
> > I will look into this and see how this can be fixed.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your patience.
> This is fixed with v4 of this series.

Great, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog