Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] perf annotate: Fix wrong --show-total-period option showing number of samples

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:53:28AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> On 07/25/2017 11:42 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Moreover there is the below case that is not aligned due to big period
> > > values.

> > So, that "moreover" means its not just one patch, but at least two, i.e.
> > when one selects show-total-period we better have more space for that
> > column, right?
 
> I got it. will separate this patch.

Ok, please continue your work from my perf/core branch that I just
pushed, in it the latest patch is this one:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=143e9656aec7c61b9b8e134da5abc5dfb6133cbf

Which is a chunk of what you done below. More comments below.
 
> > I'll break the patch below accordingly.
> > 
> > And even then, there is one question left, see below
> > 
> > > perf annotate --stdio -i milian.data --show-total-period
> > >   Percent |      Source code & Disassembly of test for cycles:ppp (1442
> > > samples)
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >           :
> > >           :
> > >           :
> > >           :      Disassembly of section .text:
> > > ...
> > >         0 :        40089d:       pxor   %xmm1,%xmm1
> > >   27288350 :       4008a1:       cvtsi2sd %rsi,%xmm1
> > >         0 :        4008a6:       pxor   %xmm5,%xmm5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So, I made a patch like below:
<SNIP>
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > @@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ static int disasm_line__print(struct disasm_line *dl,
> > > struct symbol *sym, u64 st
> > >                           color = get_percent_color(percent);
> > > 
> > >                           if (symbol_conf.show_total_period)
> > > -                                color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %7" PRIu64,
> > > +                                color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %11" PRIu64,
> > >                                                 sample.period);
> > 
> > this part will be in a separate patch, i.e. something like:
> > 
> >    [PATCH] Widen "Period" column when using --show-total-period
> > 
> 
> ok.
> 
> > >                           else
> > >                                   color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %7.2f",
> > > percent);
> > > @@ -1173,6 +1173,10 @@ static int disasm_line__print(struct disasm_line *dl,
> > > struct symbol *sym, u64 st
> > >                   if (perf_evsel__is_group_event(evsel))
> > >                           width *= evsel->nr_members;
> > > 
> > > +                if (symbol_conf.show_total_period)
> > > +                        width += perf_evsel__is_group_event(evsel) ?
> > > +                                4 * evsel->nr_members : 4;
> > > +
> > 
> > But what about this one? What is that '4' for? Not obvious at first
> > sight, can you elaborate on the need for this specific one?
> > 
> 
> Yep, if you check the above code lines, like below:
> 
>   color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %11" PRIu64,
>                 sample.period);
> 
> The above number of letters is 12
> i.e. 12 = 1 (" ": white space) + 11 (digits of sample.period)
> 
> So, I used '4', because the 'width' variable is initialized as '8'.

Think that I am 7 years old :o) I'm still not understanding this
logic...

> Additionally this patch handle the width for group event like below:
> 
>   $ perf annotate --show-total-period -i group_events.data --stdio
>  Event count                         |  Source code & Disassembly of old for
> cycles (529 samples)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                      :
>                                      :
>                                      :
>                                      :  Disassembly of section .text:
>                                      :
>                                      :  0000000000400816
> <get_cond_maxprice>:
>                                      :  get_cond_maxprice():
>            0           0        7144 :    400816:       push   %rbp
>      3480988           0        5709 :    400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
>            0           0        7522 :    40081a:       mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
> 
> 
> Sorry, I repeatedly failed to adjust a proper patch unit..
> I'll remake this patches based on your comment,
> and resend next patchset !

It is not a problem, you're making progress, thanks for taking into
accoutn my comments.

The end result may be the same, but having a good patch granularity is
fundamental for bisecting, also for maintainers to cherry-pick parts of
your work that they agree on while making comments about parts that
looks wrong or needing some more work.
 
> > >                   if (!*dl->line)
> > >                           printf(" %*s:\n", width, " ");
> > >                   else
> > > @@ -1823,8 +1827,14 @@ int symbol__annotate_printf(struct symbol *sym,
> > > struct map *map,
> > >           if (perf_evsel__is_group_event(evsel))
> > >                   width *= evsel->nr_members;
> > > 
> > > +        if (symbol_conf.show_total_period)
> > > +                width += perf_evsel__is_group_event(evsel) ?
> > > +                        4 * evsel->nr_members : 4;
> > 
> > What about this one?
> > 
> 
> ditto.
> 
> > > +
> > >           graph_dotted_len = printf(" %-*.*s|     Source code & Disassembly
> > > of %s for %s (%" PRIu64 " samples)\n",
> > > -               width, width, "Percent", d_filename, evsel_name,
> > > h->nr_samples);
> > > +                                  width, width,
> > > +                                  symbol_conf.show_total_period ? "Event
> > > count" : "Percent",
> > > +                                  d_filename, evsel_name, h->nr_samples);
> > > 
> > 
> > this one will be in a separate patch, with the title you chose:
> > 
> >     [PATCH] perf annotate: Show the proper header when using --show-total-period
> > 
> 
> ok.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Taeung
> 
> > >           printf("%-*.*s----\n",
> > >                  graph_dotted_len, graph_dotted_len, graph_dotted_line);
> > > 
> > 
> > - Arnaldo
> >