[PATCH 0/2] lkdtm: Provide more complete coverage for REFCOUNT tests

From: Kees Cook
Date: Tue Jul 25 2017 - 14:34:19 EST

Next message: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 1/2] lkdtm: Provide more complete coverage for REFCOUNT tests"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is a short series to provide behavior and performance tests for
refcount_t, taking into account both CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL and the new
x86-fast protection.

-Kees

Next message: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 1/2] lkdtm: Provide more complete coverage for REFCOUNT tests"
Previous message: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]