[PATCH 4.12 180/196] percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>

commit 104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a upstream.

Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable.  Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add.  In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent.  The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.

Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.

This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.

tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity.  Cosmetic
    indentation updates.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c             |   12 ++++++------
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c           |    6 +++---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c               |    8 ++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c             |    4 ++--
 include/linux/backing-dev.h    |    2 +-
 include/linux/blk-cgroup.h     |    6 +++---
 include/linux/mman.h           |    2 +-
 include/linux/percpu_counter.h |    7 ++++---
 include/net/inet_frag.h        |    4 ++--
 lib/flex_proportions.c         |    6 +++---
 lib/percpu_counter.c           |    4 ++--
 11 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1255,9 +1255,9 @@ void clean_tree_block(struct btrfs_fs_in
 		btrfs_assert_tree_locked(buf);
 
 		if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, &buf->bflags)) {
-			__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
-					     -buf->len,
-					     fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+			percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+						 -buf->len,
+						 fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 			/* ugh, clear_extent_buffer_dirty needs to lock the page */
 			btrfs_set_lock_blocking(buf);
 			clear_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
@@ -4049,9 +4049,9 @@ void btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(struct exte
 			buf->start, transid, fs_info->generation);
 	was_dirty = set_extent_buffer_dirty(buf);
 	if (!was_dirty)
-		__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
-				     buf->len,
-				     fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+		percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+					 buf->len,
+					 fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY
 	if (btrfs_header_level(buf) == 0 && check_leaf(root, buf)) {
 		btrfs_print_leaf(fs_info, buf);
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3597,9 +3597,9 @@ lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_
 		set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags);
 		spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
 		btrfs_set_header_flag(eb, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_WRITTEN);
-		__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
-				     -eb->len,
-				     fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
+		percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+					 -eb->len,
+					 fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
 		ret = 1;
 	} else {
 		spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -1766,8 +1766,8 @@ static void btrfs_set_bit_hook(struct in
 		if (btrfs_is_testing(fs_info))
 			return;
 
-		__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, len,
-				     fs_info->delalloc_batch);
+		percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, len,
+					 fs_info->delalloc_batch);
 		spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
 		BTRFS_I(inode)->delalloc_bytes += len;
 		if (*bits & EXTENT_DEFRAG)
@@ -1840,8 +1840,8 @@ static void btrfs_clear_bit_hook(struct
 					&inode->vfs_inode,
 					state->start, len);
 
-		__percpu_counter_add(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, -len,
-				     fs_info->delalloc_batch);
+		percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->delalloc_bytes, -len,
+					 fs_info->delalloc_batch);
 		spin_lock(&inode->lock);
 		inode->delalloc_bytes -= len;
 		if (do_list && inode->delalloc_bytes == 0 &&
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ xfs_mod_icount(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
 	int64_t			delta)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
 	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) < 0) {
 		ASSERT(0);
 		percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, -delta);
@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ xfs_mod_fdblocks(
 	else
 		batch = XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH;
 
-	__percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_fdblocks, delta, batch);
 	if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_fdblocks, mp->m_alloc_set_aside,
 				     XFS_FDBLOCKS_BATCH) >= 0) {
 		/* we had space! */
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static inline bool bdi_has_dirty_io(stru
 static inline void __add_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 				 enum wb_stat_item item, s64 amount)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&wb->stat[item], amount, WB_STAT_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&wb->stat[item], amount, WB_STAT_BATCH);
 }
 
 static inline void __inc_wb_stat(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
--- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static inline void blkg_stat_exit(struct
  */
 static inline void blkg_stat_add(struct blkg_stat *stat, uint64_t val)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&stat->cpu_cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&stat->cpu_cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -597,14 +597,14 @@ static inline void blkg_rwstat_add(struc
 	else
 		cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_READ];
 
-	__percpu_counter_add(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
 
 	if (op_is_sync(op))
 		cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_SYNC];
 	else
 		cnt = &rwstat->cpu_cnt[BLKG_RWSTAT_ASYNC];
 
-	__percpu_counter_add(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(cnt, val, BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH);
 }
 
 /**
--- a/include/linux/mman.h
+++ b/include/linux/mman.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ unsigned long vm_memory_committed(void);
 
 static inline void vm_acct_memory(long pages)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&vm_committed_as, pages, vm_committed_as_batch);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&vm_committed_as, pages, vm_committed_as_batch);
 }
 
 static inline void vm_unacct_memory(long pages)
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_
 
 void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
-void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
+void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
+			      s32 batch);
 s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 int __percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs, s32 batch);
 
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ static inline int percpu_counter_compare
 
 static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
 }
 
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
@@ -136,7 +137,7 @@ percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter
 }
 
 static inline void
-__percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
+percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
 {
 	percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount);
 }
--- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static inline int frag_mem_limit(struct
 
 static inline void sub_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf, int i)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&nf->mem, -i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&nf->mem, -i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
 }
 
 static inline void add_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf, int i)
 {
-	__percpu_counter_add(&nf->mem, i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&nf->mem, i, frag_percpu_counter_batch);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int sum_frag_mem_limit(struct netns_frags *nf)
--- a/lib/flex_proportions.c
+++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(
 		if (val < (nr_cpu_ids * PROP_BATCH))
 			val = percpu_counter_sum(&pl->events);
 
-		__percpu_counter_add(&pl->events,
+		percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events,
 			-val + (val >> (period-pl->period)), PROP_BATCH);
 	} else
 		percpu_counter_set(&pl->events, 0);
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(
 void __fprop_inc_percpu(struct fprop_global *p, struct fprop_local_percpu *pl)
 {
 	fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
-	__percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
 	percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
 }
 
@@ -267,6 +267,6 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop
 			return;
 	} else
 		fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
-	__percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
+	percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH);
 	percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1);
 }
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_co
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_set);
 
-void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
+void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
 {
 	s64 count;
 
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_add_batch);
 
 /*
  * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result.  This is a more accurate