Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Jul 26 2017 - 08:57:00 EST


On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:32:44 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 01:00:12 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:31:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > On one of my test machines nhi_mailbox_cmd() called from icm_suspend()
> > > > times out and returnes an error which then is propagated to the
> > > > caller and causes the entire system suspend to be aborted which isn't
> > > > very useful.
> > > >
> > > > Instead of aborting system suspend, print the error into the log
> > > > and continue.
> > >
> > > I agree, it should not prevent suspend but I wonder why it fails in the
> > > first place? Can you check what is the return value?
> >
> > As per the above, the error is a timeout, ie. -ETIMEDOUT.
>
> Ah, right I somehow missed that.
>
> Does it have Falcon Ridge controller or Alpine Ridge?

I'll check later today, but i guess you'll know (see below).

> Just to make sure, can you increase the timeout in nhi_mailbox_cmd()
> to 1000ms or so. It should not take that long though but better to check.

Well, I can do that, but I don't think it will help.

It just looks like the chip is not responding at all at that point.

> Which system this is BTW?

It's the Dell 9360. :-)

Sometimes after a reboot or a power cycle it starts in a state in which the
TBT controller and a USB one (which seem to be somehow connected)
appear to be dead or at least really flaky. Basically, the box needs to be
power-cycled again to get rid of this condition and then everything works.

Thanks,
Rafael