Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: Cast mismatched enum types passed to memcg state and event functions

[Matthias Kaehlcke]

El Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:23:09PM -0700 Andrew Morton ha dit:

> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:23:56 -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > In multiple instances enum values of an incorrect type are passed to
> > mod_memcg_state() and other memcg functions. Apparently this is
> > intentional, however clang rightfully generates tons of warnings about
> > the mismatched types. Cast the offending values to the type expected
> > by the called function. The casts add noise, but this seems preferable
> > over losing the typesafe interface or/and disabling the warning.
> > 
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static inline void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> >  	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> >  		return;
> >  	pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> > -	__mod_memcg_state(pn->memcg, idx, val);
> > +	__mod_memcg_state(pn->memcg, (enum memcg_stat_item)idx, val);
> >  	__this_cpu_add(pn->lruvec_stat->count[idx], val);
> >  }
> 
> __mod_memcg_state()'s `idx' arg can be either enum memcg_stat_item or
> enum memcg_stat_item.  I think it would be better to just admit to
> ourselves that __mod_memcg_state() is more general than it appears, and
> change it to take `int idx'.  I assume that this implicit cast of an
> enum to an int will not trigger a clang warning?

Sure, no warnings are raised for implicit casts from enum to
int.

__mod_memcg_state() is not the only function though, all these
functions are called with conflicting types:

memcg_page_state()
__mod_memcg_state()
mod_memcg_state()
count_memcg_events()
count_memcg_page_event()
memcg_sum_events()

Should we change all of them to reveice an int instead of an enum?