Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching

From: Nate Watterson
Date: Fri Jul 28 2017 - 23:57:47 EST

Next message: Tetsuo Handa: "Re: Possible race condition in oom-killer"
Previous message: Adrien Saif: "Business Proposal"
Next in thread: Robin Murphy: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Robin,
I am seeing a crash when performing very basic testing on this series
with a Mellanox CX4 NIC. I dug into the crash a bit, and think this
patch is the culprit, but this rcache business is still mostly
witchcraft to me.

# ifconfig eth5 up
# ifconfig eth5 down
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020
user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgd = ffff8007dbf47c00
[0000000000000020] *pgd=00000006efab0003, *pud=00000006efab0003, *pmd=00000007d8720003, *pte=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 47 PID: 5082 Comm: ifconfig Not tainted 4.13.0-rtp-enablement+ #3
task: ffff8007da1e5780 task.stack: ffff8007ddcb8000
PC is at __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58
LR is at private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60
pc : [<ffff00000852c6e4>] lr : [<ffff00000852cdac>] pstate: 204001c5
sp : ffff8007ddcbba00
x29: ffff8007ddcbba00 x28: ffff8007c8350210
x27: ffff8007d1a80000 x26: ffff8007dcc20800
x25: 0000000000000140 x24: ffff8007c98f0008
x23: 00000000fffffe4e x22: 0000000000000140
x21: ffff8007c98f0008 x20: ffff8007c9adb240
x19: ffff8007c98f0018 x18: 0000000000000010
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
x15: 4000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
x13: 00000000ffffffff x12: 0000000000000001
x11: dead000000000200 x10: 00000000ffffffff
x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8007c9adb1c0
x7 : 0000000040002000 x6 : 0000000000210d00
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 000000000000c57e
x3 : 00000000ffffffcf x2 : 00000000ffffffcf
x1 : ffff8007c9adb240 x0 : 0000000000000000
[...]
[<ffff00000852c6e4>] __cached_rbnode_delete_update+0x2c/0x58
[<ffff00000852cdac>] private_free_iova+0x2c/0x60
[<ffff00000852cea4>] iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x4c/0xa0
[<ffff00000852d0a8>] free_iova_fast+0x1b0/0x230
[<ffff000008529d34>] iommu_dma_free_iova+0x5c/0x80
[<ffff000008529db4>] __iommu_dma_unmap+0x5c/0x98
[<ffff00000852aebc>] iommu_dma_unmap_resource+0x24/0x30
[<ffff00000852aed4>] iommu_dma_unmap_page+0xc/0x18
[<ffff000008093030>] __iommu_unmap_page+0x40/0x60
[<ffff0000087401bc>] mlx5e_page_release+0xbc/0x128
[<ffff000008740498>] mlx5e_dealloc_rx_wqe+0x30/0x40
[<ffff000008735ef0>] mlx5e_close_channel+0x70/0x1f8
[<ffff0000087370f4>] mlx5e_close_channels+0x2c/0x50
[<ffff0000087385dc>] mlx5e_close_locked+0x54/0x68
[<ffff000008738620>] mlx5e_close+0x30/0x58
[...]

** Disassembly for __cached_rbnode_delete_update() near the fault **
92|if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
FFFF00000852C6C4| ldr x3,[x1,#0x18] ; x3,[free,#24]
FFFF00000852C6C8| ldr x2,[x0,#0x30] ; x2,[iovad,#48]
FFFF00000852C6CC| cmp x3,x2
FFFF00000852C6D0| b.cs 0xFFFF00000852C708
| curr = &iovad->cached32_node;
94|if (!curr)
FFFF00000852C6D4| adds x19,x0,#0x18 ; x19,iovad,#24
FFFF00000852C6D8| b.eq 0xFFFF00000852C708
|
|cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node);
|
99|if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)
FFFF00000852C6DC| ldr x0,[x19] ; xiovad,[curr]
FFFF00000852C6E0| ldr x2,[x1,#0x20] ; x2,[free,#32]
FFFF00000852C6E4| ldr x0,[x0,#0x20] ; x0,[x0,#32]
Apparently cached_iova was NULL so the pfn_lo access faulted.

FFFF00000852C6E8| cmp x2,x0
FFFF00000852C6EC| b.cc 0xFFFF00000852C6FC
FFFF00000852C6F0| mov x0,x1 ; x0,free
100| *curr = rb_next(&free->node);
After instrumenting the code a bit, this seems to be the culprit. In the
previous call, free->pfn_lo was 0xFFFF_FFFF which is actually the
dma_limit for the domain so rb_next() returns NULL.

Let me know if you have any questions or would like additional tests
run. I also applied your "DMA domain debug info" patches and dumped the
contents of the domain at each of the steps above in case that would be
useful. If nothing else, they reinforce how thirsty the CX4 NIC is
especially when using 64k pages and many CPUs.

-Nate

On 7/21/2017 7:42 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:

The cached node mechanism provides a significant performance benefit for
allocations using a 32-bit DMA mask, but in the case of non-PCI devices
or where the 32-bit space is full, the loss of this benefit can be
significant - on large systems there can be many thousands of entries in
the tree, such that traversing to the end then walking all the way down
to find free space every time becomes increasingly awful.

Maintain a similar cached node for the whole IOVA space as a superset of
the 32-bit space so that performance can remain much more consistent.

Inspired by work by Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>.

Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
---

v2: No change

drivers/iommu/iova.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
include/linux/iova.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
index d094d1ca8f23..f5809a2ee6c2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ init_iova_domain(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long granule,
spin_lock_init(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock);
iovad->rbroot = RB_ROOT;
+ iovad->cached_node = NULL;
iovad->cached32_node = NULL;
iovad->granule = granule;
iovad->start_pfn = start_pfn;
@@ -57,48 +58,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_iova_domain);
static struct rb_node *
__get_cached_rbnode(struct iova_domain *iovad, unsigned long *limit_pfn)
{
- if ((*limit_pfn > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn) ||
- (iovad->cached32_node == NULL))
+ struct rb_node *cached_node = NULL;
+ struct iova *curr_iova;
+
+ if (*limit_pfn <= iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
+ cached_node = iovad->cached32_node;
+ if (!cached_node)
+ cached_node = iovad->cached_node;
+ if (!cached_node)
return rb_last(&iovad->rbroot);
- else {
- struct rb_node *prev_node = rb_prev(iovad->cached32_node);
- struct iova *curr_iova =
- rb_entry(iovad->cached32_node, struct iova, node);
- *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo;
- return prev_node;
- }
+
+ curr_iova = rb_entry(cached_node, struct iova, node);
+ *limit_pfn = curr_iova->pfn_lo;
+
+ return rb_prev(cached_node);
}
static void
-__cached_rbnode_insert_update(struct iova_domain *iovad,
- unsigned long limit_pfn, struct iova *new)
+__cached_rbnode_insert_update(struct iova_domain *iovad, struct iova *new)
{
- if (limit_pfn != iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
- return;
- iovad->cached32_node = &new->node;
+ if (new->pfn_lo > iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
+ iovad->cached_node = &new->node;
+ else
+ iovad->cached32_node = &new->node;
}
static void
__cached_rbnode_delete_update(struct iova_domain *iovad, struct iova *free)
{
struct iova *cached_iova;
- struct rb_node *curr;
+ struct rb_node **curr = NULL;
- if (!iovad->cached32_node)
- return;
- curr = iovad->cached32_node;
- cached_iova = rb_entry(curr, struct iova, node);
+ if (free->pfn_hi < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
+ curr = &iovad->cached32_node;
+ if (!curr)
+ curr = &iovad->cached_node;
- if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo) {
- struct rb_node *node = rb_next(&free->node);
- struct iova *iova = rb_entry(node, struct iova, node);
+ cached_iova = rb_entry(*curr, struct iova, node);
- /* only cache if it's below 32bit pfn */
- if (node && iova->pfn_lo < iovad->dma_32bit_pfn)
- iovad->cached32_node = node;
- else
- iovad->cached32_node = NULL;
- }
+ if (free->pfn_lo >= cached_iova->pfn_lo)
+ *curr = rb_next(&free->node);
}
/* Insert the iova into domain rbtree by holding writer lock */
@@ -135,7 +134,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
{
struct rb_node *prev, *curr = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long saved_pfn;
unsigned long align_mask = ~0UL;
if (size_aligned)
@@ -143,7 +141,6 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
/* Walk the tree backwards */
spin_lock_irqsave(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
- saved_pfn = limit_pfn;
curr = __get_cached_rbnode(iovad, &limit_pfn);
prev = curr;
while (curr) {
@@ -173,7 +170,7 @@ static int __alloc_and_insert_iova_range(struct iova_domain *iovad,
/* If we have 'prev', it's a valid place to start the insertion. */
iova_insert_rbtree(&iovad->rbroot, new, prev);
- __cached_rbnode_insert_update(iovad, saved_pfn, new);
+ __cached_rbnode_insert_update(iovad, new);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iovad->iova_rbtree_lock, flags);
diff --git a/include/linux/iova.h b/include/linux/iova.h
index e0a892ae45c0..0bb8df43b393 100644
--- a/include/linux/iova.h
+++ b/include/linux/iova.h
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct iova_rcache {
struct iova_domain {
spinlock_t iova_rbtree_lock; /* Lock to protect update of rbtree */
struct rb_root rbroot; /* iova domain rbtree root */
- struct rb_node *cached32_node; /* Save last alloced node */
+ struct rb_node *cached_node; /* Save last alloced node */
+ struct rb_node *cached32_node; /* Save last 32-bit alloced node */
unsigned long granule; /* pfn granularity for this domain */
unsigned long start_pfn; /* Lower limit for this domain */
unsigned long dma_32bit_pfn;

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Next message: Tetsuo Handa: "Re: Possible race condition in oom-killer"
Previous message: Adrien Saif: "Business Proposal"
Next in thread: Robin Murphy: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/iova: Extend rbtree node caching"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]