Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] iomap: introduce io{read|write}64_{lo_hi|hi_lo}

[Logan Gunthorpe]

On 30/07/17 10:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In order to provide non-atomic functions for io{read|write}64 that will
>> use readq and writeq when appropriate. We define a number of variants
>> of these functions in the generic iomap that will do non-atomic
>> operations on pio but atomic operations on mmio.
>>
>> These functions are only defined if readq and writeq are defined. If
>> they are not, then the wrappers that always use non-atomic operations
>> from include/linux/io-64-nonatomic*.h will be used.
> 
> Don't you see here a slight problem?
> 
> In some cases we want to substitute atomic in favour of non-atomic
> when both are defined.
> So, please don't do this "smartly".

I'm not sure what you mean here. The driver should use ioread64 and
include an io-64-nonatomic header. Then there are three cases:

1) The arch has no atomic 64 bit io operations defined. In this case it
uses the non-atomic inline function in the io-64-nonatomic header.

2) The arch uses CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP and has readq defined, but not
ioread64 defined (likely because pio can't do atomic 64 bit operations
but mmio can). In this case we need to use the ioread64_xx functions
defined in iomap.c which do atomic mmio and non-atomic pio.

3) The arch has ioread64 defined so the atomic operation is used.

>> +u64 ioread64_lo_hi(void __iomem *addr)
>> +{
>> +       IO_COND(addr, return pio_read64_lo_hi(port), return readq(addr));
>> +       return 0xffffffffffffffffLL;
>> +}
> 
> U missed u.

I'll fix this in the next revision.

Thanks,

Logan