Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-hid: Wake up Dell Latitude 7275 from suspend-to-idle

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Friday, July 28, 2017 02:06:36 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> On Dell Latitude 7275 the 5-button array is not exposed in the
>>> ACPI tables, but still notifies are sent to the Intel HID device
>>> object (device ID INT33D5) in response to power button actions while
>>> suspended to idle.  However, they are currently ignored as the
>>> intel-hid driver is not prepared to take care of them.
>>>
>>> As a result, power button wakeup from suspend-to-idle doesn't work
>>> on this platform, but suspend-to-idle is the only reliable suspend
>>> variant on it (the S3 implementation in the platform firmware turns
>>> out to be broken), so it would be good to handle it properly.
>>>
>>> For this reason, add an upfront check against the power button press
>>> event (0xCE) to notify_handler() in the wakeup mode which allows it
>>> to catch the power button wakeup notification on the affected
>>> platform (even though priv->array is NULL on it) and should not
>>> change the behavior on platforms with priv->array present (because
>>> priv->array contains the event in question in those cases).
>>>
>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196115
>>> Tested-by: JÃrÃme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Please note that this change is requisite for
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9873159/
>>
>> so are there any objections or concerns?
>
> Not from my side,
>
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>

OK, thanks!

I'm going to route it through the PM tree then if that's not a problem.

Thanks,
Rafael